In December, an arbitration panel in CIETAC, the subsidiary of ADNRDC in China, ruled Hangzhou Keluoma, an optical accessory retailer to transfer domain name to Chroma Technology Corp. (Chroma Tech), manufacture of world’s finest optical filter.


A panel of three tried the dispute according to UDRP (Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy) and decided is confusingly similar to trademark ”Chroma” which Chroma Tech owns in China and in countries around the world; Hangzhou Keluoma has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name and has registered and has been using the domain name in “bad faith”.


As an optical filter manufacture well known in the industry located in the United States, Chroma Tech had registered trademark “Chroma” on optical filters and accessories of microscopy equipment in China and worldwide and has been using the trademark in China from early 2000. It comes to Chroma Tech’s attention that Hanghzou Keluoma has registered domain name and has been selling chroma’s optical filters since 2016. Knowing that Hanghzou keluoma is not willing to transfer the domain name voluntarily, Chroma filed a complaint with CIETAC.


Mingdun prepared and submitted comprehensive evidence on Hangzhou Keluoma’s lacking rights and legitimate interests and “bad faith” in registering and using the domain name in dispute, as well as powerful rebuttal to Keluoma’s argument of good faith. Specifically, Mingdun argued Hangzhou Keluoma’s lacking rights and legitimate interests by submitting that “Chroma” is neither a phonetic translation of name of the company nor name of any board members; and argued “bad faith” by submitting evidence to show that “Chroma” has long been known in relevant field such as optical accessories and equipment and tightly connected with Chroma Tech whereas Hangzhou Keluoma has been using the “Chroma” trademark on the website linked to the domain name in dispute to attract desired internet traffic for financial gain.


Based on Mingdun’s allegations the panel ruled in favor of Chroma Tech on following rationales: 1) the essential portion of the domain name “Chroma-cn” is confusingly similar to Chroma Tech’s valid trademark “Chroma”; 2) Hangzhou Keluoma failed to proof it has rights or legitimate interests on the domain name; and 3) registration and use of the domain name is in “bad faith” because Chroma is not the phonetic translation of Hangzhou Keluoma and the domain name in dispute has been used to create likelihood of confusion and attract desired internet traffic for financial gain.


It is always important to proof bad faith in domain name disputes. Bad faith can be proofed from several aspects, create likelihood of confusion and attract desired internet traffic for financial gain can be good a choice if complainant is also doing business in the same intended market.


When resolving domain disputes, there are various approaches or courses of action that can be followed to get the registrant of a domain name to transfer it to you. The most suitable approach always depends on the specific circumstances of each domain.


Mingdun always considers the factual circumstances in the context of the applicable law. If you would like to know what is the best approach for the domain name you want, we can provide you with an opinion.



  • Related information More
  • 点击次数: 18
    2023 - 03 - 20
    Trademark rights enforcement is an important way for trademark rights holders to combat all kinds of infringement, prevent the dilution of trademark rights, as well as actively protect their legitimate rights and interests. It is also one of the important ways to achieve the value of registered trademarks. According to the circumstances in which the infringement occurred, the legal procedures to which the infringing trademark belongs, the status of use and other factors, the trademark rights enforcement cases mainly include the following two types: TypeContentTrademark ownership dispute casesTrademark squatting means preemptively registering an enterprise trademark or a trademark similar to it on the same or similar goods/services; Or preemptively re...
  • 点击次数: 6
    2023 - 03 - 14
    Recently, Mingdun Law Firm represented Kunlun Tongtai LLC. in the administrative dispute of trademark rejection review and the invalidation declaration dispute, successfully helping the client to invalidate the prior cited trademark registered in bad faith, and at the same time being making its core trademark approved for registration. The victory of these cases effectively safeguarded the client's brand and laid a solid foundation for the long-term development of the client's brand. Shenzhen Kunlun Tongtai LLC. submitted an application of registration for its core trademark “” (transliterated as “Kunlun Tongtai”, same as its trade name) in class 35. Subsequently, the CNIPA rejected the trademark registratio...
  • 点击次数: 6
    2023 - 03 - 06
    In order to effectively implement the '14th Five-Year Plan for the Protection and Use of National Intellectual Property Rights', the Enterprise Trademark Management Committee of the Beijing Trademark Association established a writing group for the Guidelines for Enterprise Trademark Management. After bringing together many front-line trademarks practice experts from leading enterprises and trademark legal service institutions, and on the basis of full research, the writing team compiled the Guidelines for Enterprise Trademark Management (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines).  On February 28, 2023, the Beijing Trademark Association held a press conference. The Guidelines was officially released. Mr. James Liu, as one of the editors-in-chief, ...
  • 点击次数: 20
    2023 - 01 - 30
    On 7 January 2023, Mr. Peter Brody, as Chair of the Legislation and Regulation Committee of the International Trademark Association (' INTA '), sent a congratulatory email to Ms. Yingying Zhu, partner of MINGDUN Law Firm. It is announced that Ms. Zhu has been selected by the INTA Legislation and Regulation Committee Asia Pacific Branch as an INTA High-Performing Committee Member and will be featured in an INTA Bulletin, and be highlighted in INTA’s social media. Ms. Yingying Zhu graduated from Peking University and University of California, Berkeley, USA. She is qualified as a lawyer in China and a lawyer in New York State, USA. She has worked for many years in the fields of IP strategy consulting and protection, anti-counterfeiting, data privacy and network security, IP litig...
× WeChat official account
Beijing Mingdun Law Firm
Copyright 2008 - 2020 Beijing Mingdun Law FirmRhino Cloud Provides Enterprise Cloud Services